If you are interested in a mold lawsuit, you may want to read our review of the Mold Law Group. This expert legal firm specializes in lawsuits involving mold contamination and the associated costs. We discuss the contexts in which mold claims arise, how they’re evaluated, and how to file a claim. We also look at what to expect when you hire a mold law firm. We’ll discuss Dr. Gary J. Ordog, the firm’s founder and a few other things you should expect.
As a consumer, you need to be aware of the costs associated with a mold lawsuit, and whether you need to hire a mold law group or go without it. Mold lawsuits can be expensive and require a significant amount of staff time, but it is also possible to settle a lawsuit for less than the full cost of the damages. Considering these costs, you should look into the mold law group reviews of your chosen firm.
In most cases, a plaintiff will retain an environmental testing firm and a laboratory to help establish the extent of mold damage. It is also common to retain an expert witness who is knowledgeable about the effects of mold exposure on people. In some cases, plaintiffs will also use the services of a neuropsychologist. These professionals are invaluable assets for the plaintiff’s case, since they can testify about the effects of mold on the human body.
A legal claim for mold exposure can result in compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. If you have a spouse or child who suffered from exposure to mold, you may also be able to recover damages for loss of companionship and services. Depending on the severity of your symptoms, your attorney can help you determine whether or not your lawsuit is valid. You can contact an attorney for a consultation with a mold lawyer in your state and get started filing a claim for compensation.
Dr. Gary J. Ordog
At the beginning of the 2000s, California was leading the country in mold-related personal injury lawsuits. A medical expert named Dr. Gary J. Ordog attributed a variety of illnesses to mold exposure. He also acted as an expert witness, charging clients almost $1,000 per hour. In fact, he was suspended from his own professional association after being accused of misdiagnosing patients. Despite being removed from the board, Ordog continues to offer opinions on mold exposure.
If you have been exposed to mold, it is important to seek medical care as soon as possible. Mold can cause various health issues, including breathing difficulties and immune system disorders. Mycotoxins may also cause cancer or immune-system problems, and some even suffer memory loss. Although tests can detect traces of mycotoxin, it is often impossible to determine the exact degree of exposure based on these symptoms alone.
If you are wondering if you should hire a lawyer with medical training in mold cases, you can find one online. The best way to find a qualified mold attorney is to read a few Mold Law Group reviews by Dr. Gary J. Ordog. Ordog’s experience will help you decide which mold law firm will be most beneficial for you. And with their knowledge of the legal system and mold litigation, you can rest assured you will receive a quality legal representation.
Contexts in which mold claims arise
The question of whether exposure to mold is dangerous is one of the most vexing issues facing courts. While there is no consensus on whether exposure to mold causes ill effects, plaintiffs allege various ailments. Although most types of mold are relatively innocuous, the fact that some individuals experience ill effects can lead to significant claims. Here are some of the contexts in which mold claims arise. Toxic mold claims have never been proven.
Water enters a building through various means, including plumbing leaks, landscaping design, and HVAC malfunctions. When this occurs, it traps moisture-laden air, which feeds mold. If the mold is not remedied promptly, the landlord can be sued for negligence, breach of contract, and breach of implied warranty of habitability. In addition, the improper use of exterior wall sheathing materials, such as synthetic stucco, can cause mold growth.
Commercial property insurance policies contain exclusions that apply to certain types of mold. These exclusions exclude coverage for certain kinds of mold, including exposure caused by continuous water leakage, long-term leakage, and fungus or decay. Most insurers do acknowledge coverage for mold-related damages resulting from the accidental discharge of water from a closed plumbing system. However, the underlying cause of mold contamination must be proven and documented by a plaintiff.
Costs of filing a mold lawsuit
The amount of money you will receive in a mold lawsuit depends on the circumstances surrounding the exposure. You can expect to receive between $3,000 and $10,000 in damages, but this amount may be higher if you suffer from life-threatening illnesses, job loss, or even death. Even larger amounts may be available in lawsuits against negligent landlords. You should seek medical treatment immediately if you suspect you have been exposed to mold.
The first step in pursuing a toxic mold lawsuit is to consult with a local attorney. Toxic mold cases are complicated, requiring a great deal of legal expertise. You should hire an attorney who specializes in toxic mold lawsuits. These attorneys know how to gather evidence and prove liability. They can also represent you in court if necessary. Moreover, you can narrow down your search for an attorney by identifying a law firm that specializes in toxic mold litigation.
Filing a mold lawsuit involves significant legal work. A successful claim requires clear proof that the defendant’s actions were negligent and/or unreasonably dangerous. Mold can cause serious injuries and health conditions, including respiratory problems and flu-like symptoms. A good mold attorney will be able to provide evidence that will support your claim. There are several sources of coverage available. In addition to a liability insurance policy, a homeowner’s insurance policy can also address mold issues. General liability insurance may also address the issue, but this coverage is generally limited to bodily injury and property damage to third parties and does not cover cleanup.
Dr. Ordog’s refusal to testify in a toxic mold case
While a medical expert in the field of toxic mold, Dr. Michael Ordog, a professor at the University of Chicago, has published countless reports supporting the injuries caused by toxic mold, he’s also a prominent figure in the field. His reports have detailed how mold can lead to a frightening range of illnesses, from lung cancer to cirrhosis of the liver. In addition to testifying on behalf of victims of toxic mold, Dr. Ordog has been embroiled in a lawsuit against a law firm, alleging that he overstated his credentials and billed for his services.
In 2006, the Medical Board of California suspended Dr. Ordog’s license and placed him on probation. The board also accused him of making false claims on Medicare, billing for services rendered to deceased patients, and falsifying patient records. In addition, he received a suspended license and was ordered to pay $1,295,700 in restitution. Due to the criminal conviction, Dr. Ordog’s medical license has been revoked.
When toxic mold injury litigation arises, it’s often difficult to determine the proximate cause. There can be multiple defendants in a toxic mold case, so a qualified medical expert is necessary. Toxic mold can cause respiratory problems, headaches, and skin irritation. It can also be caused by construction defects, such as faulty materials or poor architectural design. In other cases, a previous owner may have failed to disclose the mold.
Dr. Ordog’s suspension from practicing as a toxicologist
A medical board in California has suspended Dr. Ordog’s medical license and placed him on probation. The board found that Ordog lied about his qualifications and billed for services rendered to deceased patients. This practice is considered health care fraud and he pleaded guilty to the charge two weeks before his probation ended. He has been suspended from practicing as a toxicologist for three years.
Despite the allegations against him, Dr. Ordog’s credentials continue to be in question. He was appointed Assistant Professor of Surgery at Drew University Medical Center in 1980, Associate Professor of Internal Medicine at UCLA in 1993, and Professor of Emergency Medicine at Drew in 1996. He now works at Mayo Clinic as a medical toxicologist, sharing an office with the respondent. While his work is often questioned, he has received many awards, including a “top-notch” honor from numerous organizations.